Previous Posts
- TEACHERS This week is a nervous time for many ...
- UNDERCLASS What are we going to do about the un...
- POST OFFICES In May of this year a battle Royal...
- POLYCLINICS Do you want a polyclinic? It has no...
- DEVONPORT What is the truth about Devonport’s f...
- BOUNDARIES Some of you can remember vividly ...
- SHARIA LAW Few things have made me as angry recent...
- MENTORING Amidst all of the media feeding frenzy ...
- LANGAGE POWER STATION Of the many camp...
- CLIMATE CHANGE In a month or two, once we have sto...
Archives
- March 2003
- April 2003
- May 2003
- June 2003
- July 2003
- September 2003
- October 2003
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
Gary's views
Gary's weekly views
Each week an article by Gary has appeared in the Plympton Plymstock and Ivybridge News in South West Devon. The articles are published here
TEACHERS
This week is a nervous time for many households who will find out whether they have been allocated their first choice of school for their child. I can remember it well first time around and am about to go through it all again, one step removed, with the grandchildren. Most years I also do my best to help a number of constituents battle the system and try and get their loved one into their chosen place of learning.
For busy, committed parents few things are more important than seeing your children settled into a good school. It can set them up for life. It is a weight off your mind. No wonder that being in the catchment area of a top-ranking school can add thousands of pounds to the value of a house.
We are fortunate in this area to have excellent schools at both primary and secondary level. I have not yet visited a school in Plympton, Plymstock or Ivybridge that I would not have been happy to send a child of mine. This cannot be said of every part of
What makes a school successful? Leadership from the top is crucial, setting the culture of a nurturing, aspirational but disciplined environment. Then, the ability and commitment of teachers makes all the difference. I do not think we say a huge “thank you” enough to the dedicated teachers we have in this part of the world. When I was preparing for university we used to have an expression: those that can, do – those that can’t, teach. This is utter rubbish and always was. I can still remember the teachers who made an impact on my life: John Lello, Mr Bacon, Miss Prior, Jim Shapter, Terry Townsend. Where would I be without their input, I wonder?
Inspirational teachers are worth their weight in gold. This has become even more true as traditional family structures have broken down over recent decades. With the rise of working mums, kids are spending more time at school and the impact of the school environment that much the greater. For some, responsible and encouraging male teachers are the nearest thing to a positive male role model in their lives.
Teachers have to deal with ever more unruly pupils, top-down initiatives and complex rules. If the next generation turn out OK, which I think it will, we owe today’s teachers a huge debt of gratitude.
posted by Nigel on Friday, March 28, 2008
Gary's weekly views
Each week an article by Gary has appeared in the Plympton Plymstock and Ivybridge News in South West Devon. The articles are published here
UNDERCLASS
What are we going to do about the underclass? Not a very nice phrase, I know, but, in all its harshness, it seems to be the best one on offer.
I refer to the group of people out there who live outside or beneath any norms of behaviour that the majority of us respect. They do not work or pay taxes, they know every trick in the book to cheat the welfare system and they live in chaotic, ever-shifting households. They underachieve at school and then live on the margins of society for the rest of their lives. Alcohol and drugs are commonplace, as is having children in a plethora of short term relationships, then giving these kids no positive input, ensuring that the next generation terrorise the rest of us in the same way.
The leaders of an independent caring charity I met with last week surprised me by saying in effect that their patience was running thin with people who have no intention of living responsibly – looking after a flat or paying rent, but continue to expect the state to fund their disordered lifestyles. They were calling for a more robust approach from government to tackle this kind of welfare dependency. This point of view seems to be spreading amongst many good-hearted professionals who have spent their lives in the support sector. The pendulum is beginning to swing.
We do people no long term favours if we constantly pick up the tabs for them irrespective of how they live. I accept that many of the men and women who live in this netherworld ever had much of a chance in the first place. They never had any love or encouragement when they were small, no positive role models, no framework of stability. I also accept that they are of equal individual value to our creator as I am.
But that does not mean the state can carry on writing a blank cheque.
Apart from better education, zero tolerance and tougher welfare rules, it seems to me that early intervention is the key: to somehow intervene in the generational cycles that perpetuate the problem. It would be highly controversial to pluck more children from these households of chaos and place them with families who can nurture them properly, but is there any other way?
What do you think?
posted by Nigel on Thursday, March 20, 2008
Gary's weekly views
Each week an article by Gary has appeared in the Plympton Plymstock and Ivybridge News in South West Devon. The articles are published here
POST OFFICES
In May of this year a battle Royal is set to commence. I refer not to local council elections which will come and go, as usual, without interfering in most people’s lives, but to a fight of a much higher order. In May, the Post Office will be announcing which of
The criteria used in this massacre of yet more cherished institutions are: customer numbers, proximity to other branches, financial benefits to Post Office Limited of closure and relative size of the branch. In rural areas, the proximity test will be met if the post office in question is more than 3 miles from the nearest other branch. In suburban areas (and I can think of 3 or 4 branches in Plympton and Plymstock) which may well appear on the kill-list, the distance is one mile.
In many areas it will be the vulnerable who will suffer most, having to relocate elsewhere to draw their pension or buy their stamps or licences. The reason for this closure plan is to save money. This is the same reason why the railway branch lines faced Beeching’s axe in the 1960’s. How short-sighted. What would we give now to have back all of that local railway infrastructure so that we could have small trains chugging from village to town getting carbon heavy cars off the road and keeping our rural areas alive.
What can be done? When the list is announced it is my intention to support every community that organises itself in a campaign to keep its post office open. If you feel yours is under threat, you may want to be thinking about this now. We cannot do much to challenge geography – although we must make sure that the distances are measured in the way humans, not crows, have to travel - but the amount of business conducted over the counter is a crucial factor we can change. If you want to retain your post office as the hub of your community, please use it as often as you can in the next few weeks. Use it or lose it was never a more worrying maxim.
posted by Nigel on Friday, March 14, 2008
Gary's weekly views
Each week an article by Gary has appeared in the Plympton Plymstock and Ivybridge News in South West Devon. The articles are published here
POLYCLINICS
Do you want a polyclinic? It has nothing to do with placing a parrot in the reception of your local doctor.
The government is proposing a shake up in the way our General Practitioners deliver their services so that for many of us we would go to a super-surgery where there might be 25 doctors working in collaboration. The plan is for about 150 of these new clinics spread across the country, serving an area of 50,000 people. So, in theory, we could have one for Plympton and Plymstock. It would be open for private sector companies to come in and set these up.
I can understand the rationale behind getting more doctors together under one roof and being able to offer more specialist services to patients without the need to go to the acute hospital. This would have special advantages for us locally, if we did not have to trek up to the gloomy towers of Derriford. I also understand that things can never stand still and governments are right to consider new ideas.
But I would like to recommend an old maxim: if it ain't broke don't fix it! The one part of the NHS that is working well for most of us is access to GP services. Hospital experience can still be an ordeal, but our GP practices tend to be efficient and friendly. The appointment system can be irritating, and of course mistakes do happen, but given how often my 70,000 constituents visit their doctors, I receive almost no complaints about this aspect of our health service. Most of us can see the same doctor most of the time, so a relationship of trust and knowledge exists. It would be good if surgery times could be a little more flexible, but most of us find a way of accessing when the need arises.
We must not throw the baby out with the bath water. If some go-ahead practices want to join forces with others under the shelter of a polyclinic and feel that they can make it work, perhaps that should be permitted. But nobody should be forced to embrace this change just because it looks good on a Whitehall drawing board.
I am keen to learn what you think about this. Do you feel you have a relationship of trust and knowledge with your local GP, or has that already gone? What do you think of super-surgeries?
Please let me know.
posted by Nigel on Friday, March 07, 2008
